|
|
|
Your
401 Plan May Cost You Too Much
Is
your company's 401(k) plan a good deal? Don't be too quick to say yes.
Sure, the 401(k) has become one of the crown jewels of employee
benefits. Nearly two-thirds of Americans are counting on them, along
with other employer-sponsored retirement programs, to serve as their
primary source of retirement funds, according to the Certified Financial
Planner Board of Standards in Denver. But just because your employees appreciate their 401(k) plan doesn't mean it's a bargain. According to HR Investment Consultants in Towson, Md., publisher of the 401k Provider Directory, the cost of running a 401(k) plan with 25 participants and $750,000 in assets can range from as little as $6,750 per year to as much as $20,000, depending on which 401(k) vendor you select.
According to Southern California-based (401k) Enginuity
(www.401kenginuity.com), twenty-year veteran in developing and running 401(k) administration and 401(k) software and recordkeeping systems, the Internet will be the primary delivery system for 401(k)s by 2007. Many web-based 401(k) plans will run on administration and recordkeeping platforms that plan providers will outsource to 401k specialists and 401k Application Service Providers (ASP).
The advantages of web-based online 401(k) plans are obvious to today's workers, and include use conveniences, real-time monitoring and reporting, and instant re-allocation of their retirement assets. The internet has also dramatically reduce the cost of 401(k) plan administration, saving plan sponsor 50% or more in ongoing fees and costs when compared to the older traditional labor-intensive plans. Outsourcing of 401(k) functions by plan providers will extend the trend towards lower cost, high-quality 401(k) products. 401(k) plan providers of all types, financial institutions including banks, insurance companies, brokerages, mutual fund companies, credit unions, and third-party administrators, are now actively outsourcing 401(k) administration and recordkeeping tasks to 401(k) ASPs --- vendors such as 401k Enginuity, whose sole function is to maintain, updated and supervise software-based 401(k) administration and recordkeeping systems on behalf of plan providers. 401(k) ASP vendors are responsible for all routine day-to-day 401(k) recordkeeping and administration functions, thus allowing the plan providers to reduce internal staff, eliminate the expense and complications of licensing, housing and running hardware and 401(k) administration software in-house. Plan providers can refocus and concentrate their efforts on to the needs of their plan sponsors and plan participants, and rely upon the outsourced ASP 401(k) vendor for the recordkeeping and technical "backbone" supporting providers' Internet-based plans. It is inevitable that some of this 401(k) outsourcing to ASPs will include secondary outsourcing of certain non-critical low-level routine day-to-day tasks to non-US locations, where labor costs are less yet the expertise is abundant.
The
tremendous variation in plan costs reflects the fact that there are many
types of 401(k) vendors, including mutual-fund companies, insurance
companies, commercial banks, investment banks, and independent
third-party administrators. Each
structures its fees somewhat differently, and each can be competitive in
certain niches of the market. But employers who choose their provider
haphazardly from this melange of vendors often wind up paying more than
they should. Creative
Computer Solutions Inc., a Pleasanton, Calif., software company, is a
good example. The company didn't realize that it was paying too much for
its $1.5 million 401(k) plan until dissatisfaction with the service it
was receiving prompted it to look for a new vendor. It found one and,
effective July 1, is saving itself and its employees more than $16,000
per year in administrative and investment-management costs combined. "The
financial advantage [of the new plan] was a very happy, big
surprise," says Bruce Jones, the company's vice president for
finance and administration. How
The Products Are Priced To
understand where Creative Computer is saving money, it helps to know how
401(k) vendors price their products. There
are two primary components to every 401(k) fee schedule. The first, and
the one that most employers focus on because typically they pay for it,
consists of administrative costs. This covers items such as record
keeping and communicating with plan participants. The
second, more-critical component is the investment-management fee, which
is levied as a percentage of the plan's assets and is paid by plan
participants. According to HR Investment Consultants, these asset-based
fees account for almost 75 percent of total plan costs for the average
25-person plan and 85 percent of the costs for the average 100-person
plan. "If
the investment-management services are being provided by the mutual-fund
industry, the investment-management fee is embodied in the expense ratio
of the mutual funds available to the plan participants," says
Stephen Butler, president of Pension Dynamics Corp., a 401(k) plan
administrator in Lafayette, Calif. "If
the investment-management services are being provided by the insurance
industry, it's the expense ratio of the funds plus some kind of annuity
wrap fee." Insurance companies sell 401(k) plans
"wrapped" by an annuity, which adds administrative expenses. For
Creative Computer's 401(k) plan, investment-management services had been
provided by a major insurance company. Today, it uses First Data Corp.,
a Rockville, Md., financial-services firm, to provide its plan
participants with an array of mutual funds as investment options. Those
funds carry investment fees nearly a percentage point lower than those
charged by the previous vendor, says Jones. Pension
Dynamics, meanwhile, acts as the administrator of the plan, a move that
is saving the company about $2,500 a year in administrative costs.
(While Creative Computer chose to have a separate administrator and
investment adviser, it is possible to buy both services in a bundled
package from mutual-fund companies, insurance companies, and banks.) Despite
the disproportionate role that investment fees play in determining total
401(k) costs, plan sponsors often pay scant attention to them, for
several reasons: *
The investment fees are charged to plan participants rather than to plan
sponsors, so there's no hit to the employer's bottom line. *
The investment fees are obscure. Plan sponsors aren't required to report
them, and some don't. *
Even among sponsors who report the fees, not all do so the same way, and
they rarely provide a line item on participant statements showing what
the investment fees are in dollars and cents. Instead,
the fees--which vary from one investment option to the next--are simply
deducted from the plan's earnings before its performance figures are
reported. Thus, a mutual fund with a 1 percent investment-management fee
that earned 10 percent before expenses last year would simply report
that it earned 9 percent. Concerned
that investors don't understand all this, the U.S. Department of Labor
earlier this year hosted hearings at which it solicited suggestions for
improving the way plan sponsors communicate cost information to 401(k)
participants. Thus
far, the department has not issued any new regulations, but in July,
Labor Secretary Alexis Herman introduced a new consumer publication, A
Look at 401(k) Plan Fees. The publication is available free by calling
the Labor Department at 1-800-998-7542 or by visiting its Web site at
www.dol.gov/dol/pwba. Investors
haven't raised much ruckus over the cost issue, in part because so many
of them don't understand how much they're paying. Their seeming lack of
interest has been compounded by the fact that the stock market has been
on a heady bull run for three years. With their account values soaring,
few 401(k) participants have been inclined to worry about costs. That
could change if the Labor Department initiative keeps media attention
focused on the topic, or when the bull market finally stalls. After all,
money spent on needlessly high investment fees is money that otherwise
would have been compounding, tax-deferred, for the benefit of plan
participants. "Even
an extra half percent charged against [plan] earnings can turn into a
huge amount of money over a period of, say, 20 years," says Butler. Because
investment-management companies' earnings through asset-based fees grow
as their customers' 401(k) accounts grow, some are starting to reduce or
even waive the other component of their charges--administrative
fees--for plans approaching $1 million or more in assets. These
apparent price breaks appeal to penny-conscious business owners, but
over the long haul the waivers may not make sense for them individually
or for their companies. "I
don't think you should consider [a waiver of administrative fees] a
break," says Guy Patton, senior vice president of Boston-based
Fidelity Institutional Retirement Services, a subsidiary of Fidelity
Investments. "You have to look at the total costs associated with a
program. The axiom that there's no free lunch holds true in this
case." Moreover,
administrative fees paid by the company are tax-deductible to the
business, while asset-based investment-management fees are paid by
participants with after-tax dollars. Often the largest account balances
in a 401(k) plan are those of the firm's owners and managers, so when
investment fees are exorbitant, the owners and managers feel the pinch
just as their employees do. Linda
Wauson, a consultant with Watson Wyatt & Co. in Houston and its
central-region practice leader for defined-contribution services,
recommends that employers look at administrative and
investment-management fees together when evaluating 401(k) plans to get
the whole picture. In addition, she suggests weighing a in carte fees
that might be charged to plan participants on a per-use basis, such as
fees for taking a loan against their 401(k) account. Wauson
also says employers should beware of hidden costs that never show up as
a hard expense. For example, some 401(k) vendors pay below-market
returns on the money-market funds they offer as an investment option to
plan participants. While this doesn't cost the employer anything, each
participant who puts money into one of those low-yielding funds loses
earning power. Given
that there's no standard method for presenting the costs of 401(k)
plans, figuring out what you're paying for your plan--or what a
competing vendor might charge you--can be difficult. But there are some
rules of thumb that can help you. If
your plan is just getting started and doesn't have much in the way of
assets, you may benefit from such a pricing structure. But watch out for
plans that levy surrender charges when you terminate them. Those costs,
and the hassle of changing providers, could outweigh the short-term
benefits of an insurance company's fee structure. As
your plan approaches the $1 million plateau, Huntley says, you may find
good values at mutual-fund companies that charge upfront sales loads to
individual investors. That's because they'll typically waive the sales
loads for large-volume 401(k) customers while still allowing you to
benefit from the low-cost administrative structure made possible by the
sales loads paid by other customers. Here
are two more suggestions for savvy 40 1(k) shopping: Pay
close attention to investment management fees. Mutual funds are by far
the most popular investment option in 401(k) plans. The average domestic
stock fund carries an expense ratio of 1.4 percent, according to data
compiled by Morningstar Inc., a Chicago-based fund-research company. But
Butler says you should be wary of paying more than 1 percent in your
401(k) plan. You should pay even less for stockindex funds, which mimic
the performance of popular benchmarks such as the Standard & Poor's
500-stock index. Their expense ratios typically range between 0.25 and
0.5 percent. Expect
to pay a little more than the domestic stock-fund expense ratio for
international stock funds (the average expense ratio is 1.84 percent,
according to Morningstar) and a little less for bond funds (the industry
average is 1.07 percent). Keep
in mind, of course, that a low expense ratio may be no bargain if the
fund hasn't performed well. Real value comes from funds that combine low
expenses with solid performance. Keep
it simple. Fancy extras such as Internet access, paperless loan
services, and large numbers of investment options can drive a plan's
costs higher. Turnkey 401(k) plans from mutual-fund companies and other
big providers often provide all of the basics and more, including
niceties such as daily valuation of account balances, for one low fee. rrp "To
the extent that you can attract and retain employees with relatively
simple features in your plan, go with simple features," says
Fidelity's Patton. "Our experience is that you can have a very
competitive plan and still keep it relatively simple." Why 401(k) Management Fees Matter
Each plan started with a zero balance, received contributions of
$200 a month, and earned
10 percent per year before expenses.
Value Of Account After 20 Years 30 Years 40 Years
Annual 1% $133,577 $366,149 $936,264
1.5% $125,400 $330,141 $807,730
Difference $ 8,177 $ 35,008 $128,534
|
|
For more information: comments@401k-help-online.com |